内容简介
“Range is an urgent and important book, an essential read for bosses, parents, coaches, and anyone who cares about improving performance.” —Daniel H. Pink
What's the most effective path to success in any domain? It's not what you think.
Plenty of experts argue that anyone who wants to develop a skill, play an instrument, or lead their field should start early, focus intensely, and rack up as many hours of deliberate practice as possible. If you dabble or delay, you’ll never catch up to the people who got a head start. But a closer look at research on the world’s top performers, from professional athletes to Nobel laureates, shows that early specialization is the exception, not the rule.
David Epstein examined the world’s most successful athletes, artists, musicians, inventors, forecasters and scientists. He discovered that in most fields—especially those that are complex and unpredictable—generalists, not specialists, are primed to excel. Generalists often find their path late, and they juggle many interests rather than focusing on one. They’re also more creative, more agile, and able to make connections their more specialized peers can’t see.
Provocative, rigorous, and engrossing, Range makes a compelling case for actively cultivating inefficiency. Failing a test is the best way to learn. Frequent quitters end up with the most fulfilling careers. The most impactful inventors cross domains rather than deepening their knowledge in a single area. As experts silo themselves further while computers master more of the skills once reserved for highly focused humans, people who think broadly and embrace diverse experiences and perspectives will increasingly thrive.
下载说明
1、Range是作者David Epstein创作的原创作品,下载链接均为网友上传的网盘链接!
2、相识电子书提供优质免费的txt、pdf等下载链接,所有电子书均为完整版!
下载链接
热门评论
-
子珂的评论近1年商业/社科最佳。给了非常多案例讨论了:10000h什么时候是不必要的(late-specialization),是否应该转专业/转行(match quality+个人成长),什么时候data-driven的文化是有害的,不同问题/领域(类比思维+问题结构分析)如何移植经验,都很有启发. 最重要的是给了希望转变、没有很早确定目标的人信心 —— don't feel behind. 遗憾的是没有给specialization更多的讨论,e.g. 在什么时候specialize是必要的,什么时候generalize是好的,这样整个话题会更全面、客观
-
daniel yu的评论讲的是通才和专才的取舍关系,当前世界的技能格局,以及通才的技能策略
-
放下手机的评论“想要相信 或者 我已经相信了” 这样是不对的,这本书大量引用Khaneman,不如直接去读Khaneman,现阶段对我无appeal | 大致略读 文中材料不新(10yr+)例子局限 作者本身是个reportor不是科学家
-
梅文女王殿下的评论2019.11.25 不喜欢读心灵鸡汤/职场/功利性的书。但是这本全不是。当初吸引到我的原因,大概看了一个介绍,说它批判早教,grit,批判固化职业... 读完以后激动不已,到处安利。里面讲的东西我100%认可。只是为什么自己笃定的东西,非要在书上读了才有底气坚持呢? “We learn who we are only by living, and not before.“
-
叮当想旅行的评论大概三章就能讲明白的道理,车轱辘话不停地说,反复地说……
-
西瓜头的评论full of stories that are bit too verbose to explain simple concepts.. finished 5 chapters (1) sampling before settling (2) analogical thinking (3) narrow-minded/biases due to narrow field
-
腾辉的评论万维钢解读
-
就不爬起来的评论不必看,很失望。
-
恶魔骑着驴子来的评论Sometimes I just need some justification
-
吴斯末的评论创新生态系统应该有意地保持范围(广度)和低效率。
-
W的评论Don't feel behind.
-
Sunny的评论观点突出,证据充分,可以看的出来作者做了大量的研究工作。的确, 通才要比专才更受欢迎,性格上也感觉通才更加容易让人接近。
-
杨戬大大的评论不如T型人才的解释来的更准确,反正不要做一个蜻蜓点水的人。
-
Nova的评论剖析了很多大家习以为常的理论,提供了不同的见解。
-
Heather的冬天的评论专才还是通才?这本书毫无疑问大力鼓吹后者。也许吹的太过头了,以至于我有些怀疑他取材过于偏颇。有些章节,虽然故事吸引人但是和主题的联系也比较牵强附会。倒是觉得其中不少内容还是有启发的,可能只是标题取的不合适。
-
漂来漂去的评论无感
-
celestesky的评论Outliers的作者做了首页推荐,其实两本书的观点并不矛盾,综合起来看,个人成长应尽可能拓展知识宽度和经历的丰富性(range),找到真正的兴趣点和专长之后再集中精力出成就,先前探索的过程也不会被浪费,有range的成就反而可能会更大。只给三颗星是因为作者很多观点挺好,但论证过程太多例子看着重复且累
-
红咕小丁的评论旁征博引了许多例子,从多个方面说明growth with range is critical in the wicked world. 初读觉得有些新奇,但越深入会发现角度很多但角度间差别不大,同时大多数也是旧瓶装新酒。 不过用作复习你过往的一些相关知识还是不错的。读了一本,感觉把Superforecasting + Thinking Fast Slow + Diversity-related books又过了一遍。书里头有几个关于NASA的例子还挺有趣的。
-
MrFrankenstein的评论还行吧 例子巨多 全是英文 看完已瞎
-
肥猫不吃鱼的评论Head start总是吸引人的,谁不想效率高呢,是最容易传播最想相信的故事。然而是一个wicked world不是一个kind world,不是有直接的反馈的世界。算是《刻意练习》的一种补充。“无效”的探索 somehow也是有用的,如何在高度专业化的世界留有自由探索的空间。然而看的时候总觉得不舒服,因为都是给了一部分的证据,看不到全面。就当是另外角度观点的evidence。 另外喜欢的一个点是 not be a clone of your advisor,find your quality match。都没有发现自己的特点,谈feel behind就本末倒置了,但是空想也是想不出的,可以tart planning experiment。 以及附注是宝藏啊,哪天会回来挖掘下附注的。