本书作者布鲁诺·拉图尔是科学知识社会的领军人物之一、巴黎学派的代表者。在这部著作中，拉图尔试图发现科学实际上是怎样“工作”的。该书以重新理解科学实践以及它与社会的关系为目的，利用大量来自科学发展的不同阶段和不同学科的轶闻趣味、案例研究和实际例证，向我们详细描述了那些能够在追随科学家左右、跟随科学家活动过程中所使用的方法规则。为了消除人们以往在自然和社会之间制造的分裂，以便形成一种新的联合，本书给予非人类因素以关键的位置。人们完全可以把本书当作一部有关科学的社会——文化研究的一般性入门读物和典型的研究实际来阅读。

With the rise of science, we moderns believe, the world changed irrevocably, separating us forever from our primitive, premodern ancestors. But if we were to let go of this fond conviction, Bruno Latour asks, what would the world look like? His book, an anthropology of science, shows us how much of modernity is actually a matter of faith. What does it mean to be modern? What difference does the scientific method make? The difference, Latour explains, is in our careful distinctions between nature and society, between human and thing, distinctions that our benighted ancestors, in their world of alchemy, astrology, and phrenology, never made. But alongside this purifying practice that defines modernity, there exists another seemingly contrary one: the construction of systems that mix politics, science, technology, and nature. The ozone debate is such a hybrid, in Latour's analysis, as are global warming, deforestation, even the idea of black holes. As these hybrids proliferate, the prospect of keeping nature and culture in their separate mental chambers becomes overwhelming--and rather than try, Latour suggests, we should rethink our distinctions, rethink the definition and constitution of modernity itself. His book offers a new explanation of science that finally recognizes the connections between nature and culture--and so, between our culture and others, past and present. Nothing short of a reworking of our mental landscape. "We Have Never Been Modern" blurs the boundaries among science, the humanities, and the social sciences to enhance understanding on all sides. A summation of the work of one of the most influential and provocative interpreters of science, it aims at saving what is good and valuable in modernity and replacing the rest with a broader, fairer, and finer sense of possibility.

《我们从未现代过:对称性人类学论集》将探讨的触角延伸到有关现代性、反现代性和后现代性的争论中，独具匠心地开创出他不同于后现代主义的“非现代”立场，力图在实践中将人类与非人类这对范畴联结起来，打破自然与历史之间的割裂以及前现代、现代和后现代之间的分裂，并通过组建准客体，重构其所谓的“现代性宪法”(the Modern Constitution)。本书已被翻译有多种语言出版，对当代科学哲学发展具有重大影响力。