凝视之爱：福柯医学历史哲学论稿，ISBN：9787801095541，作者：于奇智著

尼采作为现代哲学向后现代哲学的转折点，其审美主义的首要前提是：上帝已死，世界缺乏道德的事实。尼采既为福柯提供了批判性眼光，也为福柯提供了批判的方法——谱系学方法。本书对从尼采到福柯的审美主义的理论背景、学术渊源及思想内涵做了较为系统的梳理和研究，并试图探讨其“生存美学”对传统美学的合理补充极其发展前景。

Marking a major development in Foucault's thinking, this book takes as its starting point the notion of "biopower," studying the foundations of this new technology of power over populations. Distrinct from punitive disciplinary systems, the mechanisms of power are here finely entwined with the technologies of security. In this volume, though, Foucault begins to turn his attention to the history of "governmentality," from the first centuries of the Christian era to the emergence of the modern nation state--shifting the center of gravity of the lectures from the question of biopower to that of government. In light of Foucault's later work, these lectures illustrate a radical turning point at which the transition to the problematic of the "government of self and others" would begin.

An examination of the relation between war and politics, by one of the twentieth century's most influential thinkers From 1971 until 1984 at the Collège de France, Michel Foucault gave a series of lectures ranging freely and conversationally over the range of his research. In Society Must Be Defended, Foucault deals with the emergence in the early seventeenth century of a new understanding of war as the permanent basis of all institutions of power, a hidden presence within society that could be deciphered by an historical analysis. Tracing this development, Foucault outlines the genealogy of power and knowledge that had become his dominant concern.

本书为法国著名思想家福柯在法兰西学院演讲系列之一，授课时间为1972～1973年。福柯在学术上多产的时期，正是教授《惩罚的社会》课程这段时期，主要是关于监禁机构和其他机构及普遍社会之间的关系的具体主题。福柯对于刑事问题的探究，在1973年1月转向了更大的目标，他不但致力于刑罚的产 生方面，而且还专心于惩罚性权力的产生，即“规训的”问题。福柯提到自从监狱被发明以来，它被看做是唯一的对犯罪行径的解决方式。福柯在本课程中，首次着手研究监狱形式的司法和社会特征，从长期以来不作为刑罚而是作为惩罚的监禁如何在社会中迅速转为刑罚这一问题开始深入，指出在过去监狱并没有被包含在刑法理论中，它在别处产生，为了其他的原因而形成，在某种意义上，对监狱的接受过程是从外部过渡到刑法理论的，而事后刑法理论有责任使监狱成为正当合法的。本课程与三个方面相悖——霍布斯、阿尔都塞，克劳塞维茨、戈夫曼，马克思、汤普森——其全部论据是围绕着五个基本的主题展开的：一是从镇压向生产方面的转折；二是政治经济学和非法活动理论的发展；三是马克思主义和意识形态分析的区别；四是道德谱系学；五是与之相伴的“规训—惩罚”。

就学术领域来看，幸好还有许许多多踏实做学问的人在。尽管一时间没有那样“制作”得热闹，但功夫下去了，自然就有成果出来。有成果，不一定就抱个金娃娃，不一定“一鸣惊人”，对别人的研究工作有帮助，就很好。 福柯是法国本世纪的重要大家，他的书很难读。我起初读他的书很不得要领，他的《知识考古学》我读了好几遍，仍把握不住，那时参考书也少——王治河的书那时写出来就好了——靠自己慢慢捉摸。回想我读胡塞尔、德里达的书都有这种情形；说来奇怪，读海德格尔的书好一点，但也不断遇到困难的问题，有时还需要和别人讨论。 自己读不懂的书，不要轻易去否定它，不要轻易下断语，因为读不懂，不一定是书的问题，有时是自己的问题，一般说，应先考虑是不是自己没有弄懂。尤其是对待重要的书，应有个谦虚的态度，更不要说是古典著作了。当然，这些著作不是不许批评，不是要人做没有创造性的书呆子；但“创造性”并不是悬在空中的，悬在空中的“创造性”，或许有些“聪明”。却还谈不到“学问”。 王治河是做学问的人，他这本讨论福柯的书是下了很大功夫的，他从福柯的生平、著作人手，讨论了福柯的“考古学”、“谱系（书中用‘系谱’）学”、理性与非理性的关系、人道主义的问题、话语与权力，以及福柯和海德格尔的关系等，所涉及的都是难度很大的、对中国学术界来说是相当新的问题。过去研究得不太够，大概就世界范围说也是相当“先锋”（前卫）的，讨论起来要有相当的功力，研究性是很强的。

《福柯与性》是我对福柯《性史》一书的解读。在所有的学问家中，福柯是我的最爱。他的所说所写作所为总能引起我的钦佩和共鸣。我的解读，既有对《性史》一书的解读，也有对福柯这个人的解读。虽然我自知自己一生永远不可能达到他的高度，但是像他那样生活和写作是我内心秘密的梦想。福柯的名言“人的生活应当成为艺术品”已经成为我生活的指南。 李银河，中国社会科学院社会学研究所研究员、博士生导师，美国匹兹堡大学社会

Picador is proud to publish the sixth volume in Foucault's prestigious, groundbreaking series of lectures at the Collège de France from 1970 to 1984 . The Birth of Biopolitics continues to pursue the themes of Foucault's lectures from Security, Territory, Population. Having shown how eighteenth-century political economy marks the birth of a new governmental rationality--seeking maximum effectiveness by governing less and in accordance with the naturalness of the phenomena to be governed--Michel Foucault undertakes a detailed analysis of the forms of this liberal governmentality. In a direct and conversational tone, this book raises questions of political philosophy and social policy that are at the heart of current debates about the role and status of neo-liberalism in twentieth century politics.

這是一本進入傅柯理論世界的入門導讀，由法國中生代研究傅柯的代表性學者格霍教授執筆。書中全面考察了傅柯思想的發展，扣緊「知識」、「權力」與「主體」這三大軸心，簡明而精確地傳達出傅柯思想從早期到晚期的轉折與演進。 誠如格霍教授所言： 傅柯從沒有放棄講歷史：被排除的瘋狂的歷史、接待死亡的歷史、思想體系的歷史、監獄與戰爭的歷史、告白與主體的歷史，以及快感、肉體及欲望的歷史等。 他以講歷史的方式試圖完成現代哲學家的任務：舉發被隱藏的權力關係；挑動諸種抵抗；讓經常被壓制的聲音能夠表達自身；生產某些能夠對抗主流治理性的真知識；促進嶄新主體性的發明；懷疑我們的自由及我們行動的可能性；凸顯我們的知識、權力及主體化之體系的歷史性；展現我們從未陷入宿命，以及要改變我們的生命。

Two of the twentieth century's most influential thinkers debate a perennial question. In 1971, at the height of the Vietnam War and at a time of great political and social instability, two of the world's leading intellectuals, Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, were invited by Dutch philosopher Fons Edlers to debate an age-old question: is there such a thing as "innate" human nature independent of our experiences and external influences? The resulting dialogue is one of the most original, provocative, and spontaneous exchanges to have occurred between contemporary philosophers, and above all serves as a concise introduction to their basic theories. What begins as a philosophical argument rooted in linguistics (Chomsky) and the theory of knowledge (Foucault), soon evolves into a broader discussion encompassing a wide range of topics, from science, history, and behaviorism to creativity, freedom, and the struggle for justice in the realm of politics. In addition to the debate itself, this volume features a newly written introduction by noted Foucault scholar John Rajchman and includes additional text by Noam Chomsky.

Based on Michel Foucault's 1978 and 1979 lectures at the Collège de France on governmental rationalities and his 1977 interview regarding his work on imprisonment, this volume is the long-awaited sequel to Power/Knowledge. In these lectures, Foucault examines the art or activity of government both in its present form and within a historical perspective as well as the different ways governmentality has been made thinkable and practicable. Foucault's thoughts on political discourse and governmentality are supplemented by the essays of internationally renowned scholars. United by the common influence of Foucault's approach, they explore the many modern manifestations of government: the reason of state, police, liberalism, security, social economy, insurance, solidarity, welfare, risk management, and more. The central theme is that the object and the activity of government are not instinctive and natural things, but things that have been invented and learned. The Foucault Effect analyzes the thought behind practices of government and argues that criticism represents a true force for change in attitudes and actions, and that extending the limits of some practices allows the invention of others. This unique and extraordinarily useful collection of articles and primary materials will open the way for a whole new set of discussions of the work of Michel Foucault as well as the status of liberalism, social policy, and insurance.

This book, which Foucault himself has judged accurate, is the first to provide a sustained, coherent analysis of Foucault's work as a whole. . To demonstrate the sense in which Foucault's work is beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, the authors unfold a careful, analytical exposition of his oeuvre. They argue that during the of Foucault's work became a sustained and largely successful effort to develop a new method—"interpretative analytics"—capable fo explaining both the logic of structuralism's claim to be an objective science and the apparent validity of the hermeneutical counterclaim that the human sciences can proceed only by understanding the deepest meaning of the subject and his tradition. . "There are many new secondary sources [on Foucault]. None surpass the book by Hubert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow. . . . The American paperback edition contains Foucault's 'On the Genealogy of Ethics,' a lucid interview that is now our best source for seeing how he construed the whole project of the history of sexuality."—David Hoy, London Review of Books

《米歇尔·福柯:个人自主与教育》作者詹姆斯·屿歇尔撰写此书的目的是试图以一种与教育有关的方式在教育领域内把福柯的思想和理沦介绍给世人。詹姆斯·马歇尔认为，要想理解福柯的思想，必须去了解“二战”后法国的学术思潮和一些相关的知识，同时埘那些与福柯的思想相似或相同的思想、著作和思想家仃所了解，以此去认以福柯所采川、借鉴的观点、立场以及方法。

《激进的美学锋芒》为译者多年翻译之精选，以广阔的视野反映了20世纪西方美学和艺术等领域的发展脉络和主要问题，所选文献多为西方学界著名思想家和理论家的重要学术文章，所论述的是一些美学等领域的前沿问题，以此描绘出思想界复杂的激进理路。全书分四个专题，分别涉及现代性与后现代性、现代主义与先锋派、文化与文化研究、艺术史论与理论学派等方面。

吴猛，1975年生，河南平舆人，现为复旦大学哲学系博士生，研究方向为西方哲学史，发表论文多篇。 　　和新风，1974年生，河南平顶山人，复旦大学哲学系毕业，哲学硕士，现为《东方早报》记者。 簡介： 本書試圖將福柯思想通俗化，重視福柯思想的細節。書的第1章詳細介紹福柯生命中的成長階段；第2章至第8章包括他對瘋癲的話語分析表明，相對於瘋癲而言理性的統治地位並非如理性自己所言是〝自然〞的和〝理所當

《福柯与性:解读福柯 》内容简介：刚一接触福柯的世界，我的心就受到强烈的震撼和吸引，从此一发不可收。福柯人格与思想的魅力诱惑我冒昧地接受了这项我明知自己力有不逮的工作：解读福柯。 即使“解读”不出它真正的深度，也可以作为一种“代读”——代替那些想了解福柯又没有精力读他的书的人来读一读福柯，使他们通过我的阅读来了解福柯。或许他们也能像我一样感受到福柯思想的吸引。到那时，他们就会自己去阅读。这正是《福柯与性:解读福柯 》的目的之一。

作为法国当代最富争议的思想家，福柯不断游弋在心理学、精神病学、医学、历史学、美术学、社会学、政治学和伦理学之间，持续发现了隐藏在诸多割裂学科背后的真相。正是福柯思想的多种面向，致使人们难以理解福柯。 本书以福柯访谈及其自我学术回顾所提供的运思理路为线索，细密解读了福柯最重要的著作，以及“法兰西学院演讲”等重要文本。通过让福柯自己讲述自己，作者向读者展示了“不打引号的”马克思思想引述者福柯、不断变化断裂的福柯、一直被误解的福柯。

Madness, sexuality, power, knowledge-are these facts of life or simply parts of speech? In a series of works of astonishing brilliance, historian Michel Foucault excavated the hidden assumptions that govern the way we live and the way we think. The Archaeology of Knowledge begins at the level of 'things said' and moves quickly to illuminate the connections between knowledge, language, and action in a style at once profound and personal. [combination of two works: "L'archéologie du savoir" 1969 & "L'ordre du discours" 1971 ("The Discourse on Language" as appendix pp. 215-37)]